<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>clay loveless &#187; php 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://claylo.com/tag/php-4/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://claylo.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why not PHP 5?</title>
		<link>http://claylo.com/why-not-php-5</link>
		<comments>http://claylo.com/why-not-php-5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>@claylo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nexen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[php 5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://claylo.com/2007/02/12/why-not-php-5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm really shocked by this. According to the latest Nexen.net PHP Version Survey, over 80% of the sites out there running PHP are running some flavor of PHP 4.
Why?
For those of you who missed it, PHP 5 was released almost THREE YEARS AGO. That's right ... in a couple months, we'll celebrate the 3 year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclaylo.com%2Fwhy-not-php-5"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclaylo.com%2Fwhy-not-php-5" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>I'm really shocked by <a href="http://www.nexen.net/chiffres_cles/phpversion/php_statistics_for_january_2007.php#majeure">this</a>. According to the latest <a href="http://www.nexen.net/chiffres_cles/phpversion/php_statistics_for_january_2007.php">Nexen.net PHP Version Survey,</a> over 80% of the sites out there running PHP are running some flavor of PHP 4.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>For those of you who missed it, PHP 5 was released <a href="http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.0.0">almost THREE YEARS AGO</a>. That's right ... in a couple months, we'll celebrate the 3 year anniversary of PHP 5.0.0 stable's release.</p>
<p>I am fully aware that there are a handful of compatibility issues between PHP 4 and PHP 5 (<a href="http://www.php.net/manual/en/migration5.php">outlined here</a>). I was bitten by a few of those myself when I first started porting code over to PHP 5, but none of them were major issues.</p>
<p>So, PHP 4-using majority: what's keeping you?</p>
<p>Is it your ISP that is behind the times? Your company's system administrator? Your dependency on slow-to-upgrade libraries or applications? Or something else?</p>
<p>Please post the reason you haven't upgraded yet in the comments below. I'd very much like to know what the resistance is to PHP 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://claylo.com/why-not-php-5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
